The UN coaching govts on how to stifle cryptocurrencies makes me mad

Leonard Sengere Avatar
Blockchain Cryptos Zimbabwe

You might not understand what the fuss about cryptocurrencies is all about. Or maybe you understand but find it all rather ridiculous. Either way, you have to concede they are not going anywhere any time soon. You might have to dip your toes into those waters at some point.

Not if the United Nations has its way though. The United Nations Conference on Trade and Development is calling for action to stop the rise of cryptocurrencies in developing countries. 

Why are they doing this? Aren’t cryptocurrencies supposed to be the financial liberation tool those in poorly managed and repressive countries need? I thought the UN was all about helping said people find a way out of the mess not of their own making. 

I don’t think you need a PhD to figure out why cryptos are popular in developing countries. If we had functioning economies, fully connected to the rest of the globe, we would have a passing interest in crypto too. 

The UN acknowledges that we are looking for facilitation of remittances and a hedge against currency and inflation risks.

Hence why 15 of the top 20 countries on share of the population that owns crypto are developing countries according to the UN itself. It is this stat that has jolted the overlords at the UN to call for action.

The UN cites its reasons for calling for curbing cryptos. Full disclosure, I’m not a UN fan. Reading through their reasons I find myself hoping none of their recommendations are adopted anywhere in the world. 

Crypto instability

We know this one and there really is no disputing it. ‘Crypto’ and ‘Unstable’ are synonyms. 

Chart showing the price history chart of the most popular crypto, Bitcoin, over the last year. In the last 12 months, Bitcoin has reached a high of close to US$68,000 and a low of just under $19,000. That is quite the swing. 

Swings can be good, depending on the trades you make. As a result, some made killings when Bitcoin made its historic rise to $68,000 during the pandemic. Unfortunately, when one wins, another usually loses. That’s the game isn’t it?

Personally I’m okay with that if all the parties know that that’s how the game goes. I hate the crypto evangelists that promise/guarantee certain returns for those who invest in crypto. That’s misleading people, these markets cannot be tamed and losses are just as likely to be incurred as profits. 

So, if the UN is calling for sanity here, then I begrudgingly have to agree that we need to protect our people. Here in Zimbabwe many people sold their houses to invest in crypto and lost everything. That’s terrible.

The solution for me though is not to curb the rise of crypto but to ensure there is proper education on what cryptos are and what the reality is if one were to invest in them. I’m not even comfortable saying ‘invest’ when it comes to crypto but you get the point.

Threat to governments’ monetary sovereignty

I’m not an anarchist but chips on the table, I am not against diminishing governments’ monetary stability. I’m Zimbabwean, so you have to forgive me if I don’t have any faith in government led systems.

The UN fears that if govts step in to protect financial stability that could make the problem of crypto instability a public one. I agree. Let the wild west be the wild west. Govts should not try to protect gamblers. Their role should end at educating people on how stupid investing in memecoins is.

The UN also fears that if citizens unofficially replace local currencies with crypto as a means of payment that would jeopardise govts’ monetary sovereignty. 

Okay, is the UN trying to make Zimbabweans adopt cryptocurrencies? Cause that’s how you get people to support crypto. You tell them this would reduce our exposure to the govt’s monetary policies. Where do we sign up?

The UN goes on inadvertently making the case for why we should adopt crypto. They say stablecoins pose a significant threat to govts especially when they have unmet demand for foreign reserves. 

That’s Zimbabwe right there. Our central bank is always strapped for foreign currency assets and so is susceptible to a crypto takeover.

The UN says these cryptos present a risk as legal tender though. I cannot argue with that. We recently discussed the crash of a popular stablecoin that wiped US$40 billion in value. You can only imagine where Zimbabwe would be if we had officially adopted that stablecoin as our legal tender.

Instead of waiting and fending off crypto, the UN advises govts to adopt central bank digital currencies. We have discussed those and our RBZ is well into the research process and looks to introduce them some time not too far away.

Taxation

The UN warns that cryptos can be used to evade and avoid taxes. A terrible thing for govts like Zimbabwe’s that need every single dollar they can get. Imagine how Mthuli would be mad if we got around paying his 4% IMTT by simply switching to crypto.

This is a real problem. We can complain about the govt’s inefficiencies and rampant corruption and say that’s why we don’t want to pay taxes. The fact remains though that an underfunded govt is a problem.

If we are in a tight spot right now, it would be much worse if the govt’s revenue was significantly cut.

How should govts slow the rise of crypto?

The UN has lots of ideas on how govts can achieve this and the first is regulation, regulation, regulation. Everything from crypto exchanges, digital wallets and even decentralised finance should be regulated.

Regulation is always welcome but my resistance against it resurfaces when I note that the UN is suggesting using regulation to curb crypto. They are not advocating for the regularisation of crypto but rather the use of regulations to stifle crypto currencies. I can’t stand behind that.

The UN is also calling for regulated financial institutions to be barred from offering crypto products to their clients. Not only that, they are not to be allowed to even hold crypto themselves. I think Zimbabwe is already there. 

In other words, the formal financial sector cannot be allowed to lend any legitimacy to the crypto world.

The suggestion I love is that advertising related to crypto should be regulated. Unfortunately, the formal world has shunned the crypto world for so long that the crypto advertising that happens on social media cannot be regulated. 

The best that govts, especially the Zim one, can do at this moment is to actually run its own educational campaigns. Try to balance out the crazy, ludicrous crypto campaigns currently circulating in encrypted inboxes.

With all that done, the UN then reiterates that govts should look at CBDCs. This is a digital world after all and govts have to have their own digital solutions. At the very least they should adapt their current payment systems to the digital era.

What do you think about all this?

I have to say I don’t like how the UN is coaching govts on how to curb cryptocurrencies. Their main fear is that cryptos can render these govts powerless. Who is to say that’s not what we need?

Why does the UN acknowledge that we are looking to hedge against currency and inflation risks and to allow for easy remittances and then go ahead and coach govts on how to block that for us? I don’t get it. It is as if the UN caters for govts and not for their subjects. Curious.

I am not a crypto evangelist but I don’t appreciate what the UN is doing here. But that’s me. Let us know what you think in the comments below. Should govts be trying to stifle cryptocurrencies?

Also read:

Fancy crypto (stablecoin) crash wipes over $40 billion value, used same principles that crashed Zimbabwe currencies

Zim govt looking at central bank digital currency, what is that and why won’t it fix our problems

The RBZ invites dialogue on coming digital currency (CBDC), you have to be a part of this

17 comments

What’s your take?

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  1. really ?

    this article reads like something written by a teenager that is high on drugs and/or alcohol …, must have been a real slow day at the office today lol

    1. Chrome Ore

      Yep. He was high.
      This article is proof that mushrooms and writing don’t go hand in hand.
      You should have some molly. Not the shrooms

      1. Leonard Sengere

        🤣 Guys, in the words of Magic!, ‘why you gotta be so rude?’ Makes me think though, what does it say about me if I sound high on shrooms when I’m as sober as a Bhuddhist monk. Maybe I should lay off the caffeine.

    2. Leonard Sengere

      😂 This guy. What about it sounds like a teenager on drugs. I take it you’re in the camp that finds crypto ridiculous. This topic doesn’t interest you and it’s okay but it’s not an insignificant one.

      1. Chrome ore

        Haha, l don’t mean it bro. I’m just pulling your leg.
        I’ve got some molly though…

  2. Ruf

    No need
    You free to use crypto albeit under cover like any other thing in zim
    Thats the thing with cypto it’s intrinsically hard to regulate in the first place. But be warned it’s being manipulated by big fish. Just like the stock market

    1. Leonard Sengere

      That’s the crazy part. The more stifling they do, the more risk to individuals they introduce. People will still find a way to use crypto. It will just be in darker and darker alleys.
      The manipulation part is all too real.

  3. Crypto Fan

    The UN is a control freak organization, they hate what they can’t control. Bitcoin makes it difficult for them to manipulate economies of states through use of sanctions. Also everyone sort of knows the UN is essentially controlled by the US and it’s Allies. Cryptocurrencies make it difficult to regulate transactions, the reason we have so many cryptocurrencies right now is because the US tried to stifle the growth of Bitcoin and other coins like Ethereum and Litecoin by flooding the crypto space with crypto meant to collapse and take people’s money with it, but this failed instead it lead to an unprecedented growth, they even tried to make it difficult to mine crypto in USA but people simply moved their mining ops to China and other countries.I believe Crypto is here to stay and all actions against it actually improve it’s strength.

    1. Leonard Sengere

      I agree, the UN is all about control. They are just going to make it harder for developing world citizens to use crypto. Opening us up to more shady players. So, while they won’t kill crypto, they will stifle it to some extent, in so far as they scare away a few people.

  4. Kay Bee

    I’m so much interested in learning more about crypto.

  5. Jimmy

    The UN is afraid. Read the book “The Sovereign Individual”

  6. Cryptofan

    Need a crypto account ? Try this wallet that doesn’t shut Zimbabweans out https://paxful.com/register?r=AZ3Q31yGLYb
    You can also buy crypto using Ecocash

  7. Imi Vanhu Musadaro

    People don’t want government interference with crypto till an exchange vanishes overnight, then suddenly RBZ or ZRP must do something. 😂

  8. Tirivashe Chikumbirike

    This comes as no surprise, cryptocurrencies are a threat to these gvt issue fiat money and the Fed will have none of it.People are generally afraid of change, from the days of cowrie shells,rare beads,some animal teeth and even Rum as a form of money, to the days of coins in Greece to the days of the Gutenberg press which ushered in the invention of paper money to present,money has not evolved that much.Digital money in the form of mobile money and cypto is the next phase of the evolution of money.Try as they may to stifle this evolution money is evolving and it will elvove beyond these cryptos.

  9. The Empress

    Crypto is the future! But the future of what exactly?
    I’m confused. So can someone please explain how this Crptocurrency works exactly cos all I can see is the wild west of people trading in Crypto, somehow holding it but very few people are actually using it as an actual currency.
    Yes yes forex is traded on a daily basis same as Crypto but after that fiat USD, GBP, ZAR or whatever is traded round and round and finally lands in someone’s pocket it can be used to buy a loaf of bread but right now Crptocurrency has very few places that actually accept it!
    As a Zimbabwean I get the allure of a form of currency that the government has no sovereignty over and their poorly thought out monetary policies (the taste of the one is to one BS that the government forced us to swallow still lingers)
    But from where I’m standing Crypto seems to be something that people have decided to trade with each other with some vague belief that somewhere, someday, someone will actually figure out what to actually do with it cos right now you still can’t buy a loaf of bread with it.

  10. General

    Developing world should leave staff they do not quite understand well.For example who’s the hell is behind Satoshi Nakamoto and the others, what are their motives…… Don’t you think whoever they are don’t know challenges in financial system of third world and emerging markets…..Bankers of old have only one motive no matter what the means TOTAL CONTROL….if you can’t trust your government’s fiat or bullion coins how about Satoshi Nakamoto…. Do they publish their computer algorithms , there’s a lot of back end that is unknown , specifically Africans I know how ignorant we are…let’s learn these technologies first thoroughly little knowledge is very dangerous….Is the Chinese government stupid to ban them absolutely or an implied ban but legal in Russia… let’s understand our politics first before jumping to staff not of our own making and understanding

  11. Dubezana

    The UN is white people FUBU. People need to realise that them white people don’t like us, they will always want us pressed under they thumbs. Without the need for Forex, African gvts will be truly financially free from the west, and probably richer because no white person will just wake up and tell us that the USD is 600 times more valuable than the ZWL for no reason, given that they are both fiat currencies. You will see some people suffering from neocolonialism and self hate defending this. If it was up to me, all African countries would pull out of the UN and focus more on the AU. Like why would you even want to be in a club(UN) with permanent “executive” members that are all white. That should tell you a lot about that club